Cardiac Tamponade
Pericardial Effusion · Ketamine Induction · Preload Preservation
- Procedure:
- Pericardiocentesis vs. Pericardial Window
- Patient:
- 55M · Malignant Pericardial Effusion · Tamponade Physiology · Compensated
🚨 TAMPONADE PHYSIOLOGY — Induction of GA may cause cardiac arrest
About this case
A 55-year-old with a malignant pericardial effusion presents compensated but with tamponade physiology on echocardiography. Anaesthesia is consulted for two possible plans — echo-guided pericardiocentesis under sedation, or a surgical window requiring general anaesthesia — and the examiner will make you defend the choice.
Key clinical features
Beck's Triad
Hypotension + JVD + muffled heart sounds — tamponade until proven otherwise
Induction Risk
GA induction causes vasodilation + myocardial depression → arrest
Ketamine Preferred
Maintains sympathetic tone — safest induction agent in tamponade
Equalization of Pressures
RA = RV = LA = PA diastolic = PCWP — pathognomonic on cath
What the examiner is testing
- Whether you recognise that induction of general anaesthesia is the highest-risk moment, and how that reshapes the whole plan.
- Your reasoning about the haemodynamic goals tamponade imposes, and which routine interventions become dangerous.
- How you weigh pericardiocentesis against a surgical window on clinical grounds rather than convenience.
- Your contingency planning if the patient decompensates during induction — the examiner will force this branch.
Where candidates lose points
- Treating the compensatory tachycardia as a problem to correct.
- Proceeding to general anaesthesia without arranging for drainage to be immediately available.
- Giving a generic induction plan that ignores the fixed-preload physiology.
How it is scored
Every BoardSim case is scored across the same five phases — pre-operative evaluation, anaesthetic plan, intra-operative management, crisis management, and emergence — for a total of 100 points, with a pass set at 70 and no missed critical action. You receive a written report against each phase rather than a single number. Read the scoring methodology.
Run this case against a live AI examiner across all five phases.
Clinical content last reviewed 2026-05-12.